Search Results for "management wrong"

1458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeals Against Writ Petition Order in Co-operative Sugar Factory Dispute — Appeals involve allegations of mismanagement, enquiry under Section 83 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and liquidation proceedings.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard two Letters Patent Appeals (No. 197 of 2009 and No. 239 of 2009) arising from Writ Petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Writ Petitions Challenging Reinstatement of Untrained Teachers. Termination Held Illegal Under Section 5(2) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977, as Management's Objections Were Technical and Unsubstantiated.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard three writ petitions filed by the management of a school challenging orders of the School ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Rejection of Appeal Against Termination. Compromise Settlement in Earlier Writ Petition Did Not Bar Fresh Termination Due to Non-Approval of Appointment.

The petitioner, Hiraji Natthurao Bangare, was employed as an Assistant Teacher with respondents 1 and 2 from 1997 to 01.04.2003. His appointment was n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Service Termination Dispute — Resignation Not Challenged. Appellant failed to challenge resignation letter dated 10.4.1993, and School Tribunal's finding of resignation upheld.

The appellant, a teacher, claimed that the management refused to permit her to join and perform duties, constituting termination. She had submitted a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Bank Management in Dispute Over Supervisory Allowance Claim by Head Cashiers Under Sastry and Desai Awards. Labour Court's Order Granting Special Allowance Set Aside as Head Cashiers' Duties Were Primarily Clerical and Any Supervisory Work Was Incidental.

The dispute arose between the Management of State Bank of Hyderabad and its head cashiers, who were respondents, regarding their claim to a special al...