Search Results for "legal bar"

6665 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6665 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-lifting of Liquor by CL-9 Licensees. Court Decides in Light of Earlier Decision in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant, Allowing Petitioners to Raise Further Grounds.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by various CL-9 license holders, including bars and restaurants, challenging the imposition o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Third Delegation of Voting Rights in Cooperative Society Elections; Aggregation of Delegations Under Different Cooperative Enactments Held to Trigger Bar Under Section 21 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

These three writ petitions, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, were heard together by the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaint Not Barred by Section 10 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Agreement to Sell with Restriction on Alienation Does Not Render Contract Void Under Section 10 of TPA.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 24.01.2023 executed by the respondent/defendant in respect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Former Additional Judges from Practicing in Lower Courts. Article 220 of the Constitution does not apply to Additional Judges who resigned before confirmation, as they are not 'permanent Judges' within the meaning of the provision.

The petitioner, Nitin Shankar Deshpande, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain Respondents 5 to 9, who were ...