Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. Appeal involves multiple interim applications and stakeholders including developers and financial institutions.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "isolated sale"
183 result(s) found
Found 183 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.
17 Feb 2025The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.
1 Mar 2017The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...
- 105
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.
11 Jul 2018The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.
14 Dec 2017These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...
- 33
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.
2 May 2025The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...
- 69
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Transmission Corporation and Regulatory Commission in Electricity Tariff Disputes. Wheeling Charges and Grid Support Charges Upheld as Valid Levies Under Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998.
29 Nov 2019The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the levy of wheeling charges and grid support charges by the Transmission Corporation o...
- 301
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition in Konkan Railway Project — Market Value Fixed at Rs.145 per sq. meter Based on Comparable Sales and Development Potential. The court affirmed the Reference Court's determination under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rejecting both the acquiring body's appeal and the landowners' cross-objections.
23 Feb 2005The case involves an appeal and cross-objections against a judgment/award dated 15-9-2000 of the Additional District Judge, Panaji, which enhanced com...
- 104
High Court
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses CIDCO's Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Minister's Revision Order in Land Dispute. Held that the Minister's order setting aside mutation entries and directing restoration of original names was within jurisdiction and did not suffer from any error of law warranting interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.
20 Jul 2011The City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bomba...
- 117
