Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2363 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2363 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty on Mosquito Coils Classified as Insecticides — Unjust Enrichment Defence Rejected. Product Held to Be Insecticide by CEGAT and Supreme Court; Duty Paid Under Protest and Burden Not Passed on to Consumers, Hence Refund Cannot Be Denied Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

20 Jul 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Chemicals Limited and its Managing Director, held a Central Excise Registration for manufacturing 'Toys, Brand Mosquito C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Appeals in GST Case Despite Limitation Bar — Deficiency Memo Not Issued. Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 Mandates Issuance of Deficiency Memo and Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejecting Refund Application; Appellate Authority Must Consider Limitation Issue on Merits.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, K Line India Pvt. Ltd., a company providing shipping services, filed refund applications for IGST paid on zero-rated supplies to SEZ u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Lease Deposit Refund. Court holds that a claim for refund of a deposit is a monetary claim and cannot be secured by way of interim measure under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless there is a specific agreement or clear evidence of intention to create a charge.

7 May 2012

The petitioner, BNP Paribas Securities India Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

22 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

26 Aug 2013

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...

High Court

Writ Petition Challenging Review Orders on MVAT Refund Adjustments Quashed by Bombay High Court. Bombay High Court invalidates review orders under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act due to lack of jurisdiction, directing refund of Rs. 2.72 crores with interest.

23 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court quashed review orders issued under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act, 2022 (Settlement Act). The ...

Supreme Court

Consumer Disputes Commission Order Challenged: Court Increases Interest on Refund for Delayed Flat Possession. Appeal Results in Enhanced Interest Rate from 9% to 12% for Complainants Against Parsvnath Developers Limited

29 Jul 2024

This appeal challenges the order dated 29th September 2022, passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, which directed t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Assessment of VAT Refund Claims for Three Proprietary Concerns Under Section 48(6) of MVAT Act, 2002. Court Orders Finalization of Assessment for 2007-08 Within Three Months to Enable Set Off or Refund of Excess Input Tax Credit.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioners, three proprietary concerns, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench seeking a direction to the respondents ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Claim Despite Non-Electronic Filing in GST Case — Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions. Refund application filed manually under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 held valid as Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST requiring electronic filing is directory, not mandatory.

14 Feb 2022

The petitioners, C.P. Ravindranath Menon and Sindhu Ravindranath Menon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)