Search Results for "interest expenditure set off"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Chamber Summons for Amendment of Execution Application to Enforce Foreign Award Against Additional Respondents. Award Holder Seeks to Hold Associate Companies and Directors Liable for Alleged Asset Stripping to Defeat Award Recovery.

The matter concerned a Chamber Summons filed by the Award Holder in an Execution Application seeking leave to amend the application to enforce a forei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petition Contended That Reopening Was Barred by Limitation and Without Jurisdiction; Court Examined the First Proviso to Section 147 and the Requirement of Full Disclosure.

The petitioner, a company engaged in software development and providing services to foreign clients, challenged the reopening of its assessment for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, 3i Infotech Limited, challenged a notice dated 18 March 2009 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax seeking to reopen the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010217682014_1

...