Search Results for "harbouring"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "harbouring"

102 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Arms Act Case — High Court Erred in Acquitting Accused by Ignoring Evidence of Possession of Firearms. Conviction under Sections 25-1B(a) and 26 of Arms Act, 1959 Restored as Recovery of Country-Made Pistol and Cartridges from Accused's House was Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 2026

The present criminal appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi dated 9th May 2023 in Criminal Revision No. 285/2009. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Exparte Decree Case. Court Holds That Liberal Approach Is Required When Delay Is Not Due to Wilful Neglect and Sufficient Cause Is Shown.

19 Dec 2018

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Pushkaraj Wagh (appellant/original defendant) against an exparte decree passed in Spl. Civil Suit No. 22/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone. Appellants convicted under Section 307 read with 34 IPC for assaulting victim due to Facebook dispute settlement, but acquitted of conspiracy and harbouring.

30 Oct 2018

The appellants, original accused nos.1 to 3, were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.314 of 2014 for the of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting application for condonation of delay by applying strict standards instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

8 Oct 2018

The case involves a property dispute between family members. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed a suit for perpetual injunction against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting delay condonation application by applying strict limitation principles instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

8 Oct 2018

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed Regular Civil Suit No.155 of 2007 for...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Administrative Tribunal's Dismissal of Condonation of Delay Application in Land Revenue Revision — Limitation Period Under Section 12(2) of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended by Filing Multiple Applications. The Court Held That the Tribunal Correctly Refused to Condone a 340-Day Delay as the Limitation Period Is Mandatory and the Petitioners Had Not Provided Sufficient Cause for the Delay.

19 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Shantilal Babu Patel and his wife Sathi Shantilal Patel, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Application for Condonation of 1654 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Against Land Acquisition Award. Delay of 1654 days not sufficiently explained, and no case of substantial injustice made out to condone such inordinate delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

15 Jan 2018

The State of Maharashtra and its officers (applicants) filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 1590 days in filing appeal against enhanced compensation not condoned as state failed to explain each day's delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

4 Jan 2018

The case involves Civil Applications filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers (applicants) seeking condonation of a 1590-day delay in instit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Applications in Land Acquisition Appeals Due to Unexplained Delay of Over 5 Years. The court held that the State cannot claim benefit of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 without sufficient cause, and the delay of 5 years and 5 months was not satisfactorily explained.

4 Jan 2018

The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector and Executive Engineer, filed multiple Civil Applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Applications in Land Acquisition Appeals — Limitation Act Section 5 Not Applicable to State for Delay Beyond 30 Days in Filing Appeals Under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to multiple civil applications filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers (the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Divi...

8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)