Search Results for "disbursement"

659 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 659 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs Land Acquisition Officer to Decide Section 28A Application in Land Acquisition Case. Mandamus issued to decide pending application under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as first appeal against reference court award dismissed.

The petitioners, Ravjibhai Shankarbhai Dabhi and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Compensation Payment for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail Project - No Objection Letter Required from Housing Board. Landowner's Entitlement to Compensation Recognized Based on Allotment Order and Sale Deeds Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M. Krishnaveni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Proper Implementation of Victim Compensation Fund Rules in Prisoner Privileges Case. Court Orders Audit and Utilisation of 20% Deducted Prisoner Wages for Victim Compensation Under Tamil Nadu Victim Compensation Fund Rules, 2009.

The petitioner, M. Depalakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Package Tendering System for Road Works. Policy Decision to Reintroduce Package System Upheld as Valid Executive Action Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by individual contractors challenging the Government Order G.O.(Ms) No.162, Highways & Minor Ports (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Share Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. MOU for Sale of Shares Held Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment of the trial Court...