Search Results for "detenue statement"

138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.

The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA; Grounds Include 12-Year Execution Delay and Non-Supply of Material Translations.

In 1992, the petitioner Musthafa Ahamed Dossa was named as the head of a smuggling gang in statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail status and relied on stale material.

The petitioner, Asif Shaikh, challenged an order dated 22nd June 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, detaining him under Section 3(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Under Section 3(2) Challenged for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Credible Material.

The petitioner, Manoj @ Sonya S/o Ramdas Ghule, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 14, 19, 21, 22 and 226 of the Constitution of India and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Against Preventive Detention Order under Karnataka Goonda Act. Detenu Alleges Non-Consideration of Representation and Arbitrary Use of Power by Police Inspector.

The writ petition is a habeas corpus proceeding filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the detenu and his wife against the Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Issued Under Section 3 of the Act Against a 70-Year-Old for Alleged Dangerous Activities.

The criminal writ petition arose from a preventive detention order issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Grounds Were Not Communicated in Tulu, a Language Known to Detenu.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...