Search Results for "deemed retirement"

809 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 809 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Upholding Removal Order Due to Delay. Petitioner's challenge to removal dismissed as barred by laches, but court directs payment of pension and gratuity as per rules.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar s/o Devidas Deshmukh, a retired Tax Collector from Amravati Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross-Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Retirement Age. Settlement Between Parties Fixing Retirement at 55 Years Held Binding; Application for Modification Without Union Support Deemed Not Maintainable.

The case involved cross-writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over the age of retirement of workmen at Hotel Ramada Plaza...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Upholding Withholding of Pension. Challenge centres on validity of departmental enquiry initiated post-retirement under Rule 14A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was filed by a retired Revenue Inspector challenging the order of the Karnataka State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Leave Encashment Claim Despite Delay, Rejects Limitation Bar for Continuing Wrong. Petitioner, a retired government servant, entitled to leave encashment for 300 days under Gujarat Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 2002, and delay in filing writ petition condoned as continuing wrong.

The petitioner, Vijay B. Shah, was appointed by respondent No. 3 on a regular pay scale and rendered services for about 17 years before retiring on 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim of Retired Employee Despite Pending Regularization and Post-Retirement Chargesheet. Continuous Service of 22 Years Entitles Employee to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Irrespective of Alleged Overage at Joining.

The petitioner, Balvant Mohan Badve, a retired Civil Engineer, joined the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation on 07/09/1985 and superannuated on 01/04/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Over Compulsory Retirement Without Approval. Termination Declared Void Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Due to Failure to Obtain Prior Approval, Leading to Reinstatement with Back Wages.

The dispute arose from the compulsory retirement of the respondent, a Museum Assistant, by the appellant, National Gandhi Museum, in 2004 following mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Government Servant as Barred by Limitation Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement for Events More Than Four Years Old Held Without Jurisdiction Under Rule 214(2)(b)(ii).

The petitioner, a Junior Engineer in the Mysore City Corporation, challenged the disciplinary proceedings initiated after his retirement. He had been ...