High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "competent authority order"
10007 result(s) found
Found 10007 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.
22 Jul 2022The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.
7 Jan 2010The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.
6 Jan 2012The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...
- 189
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Pipeline Company Against Orders in Miscellaneous Petitions. Decision and Reasoning Not Included in Provided Excerpt.
3 Mar 2016The provided judgment text is a cause list and prayer portion of a High Court of Karnataka order dated 3rd March 2016, passed by Justice Ashok B. Hinc...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.
14 Dec 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...
- 585
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Petition for Revocation of Probate Under Indian Succession Act — Allegations of Non-Service of Citation on Sole Heir. The Court Examined Whether Probate Obtained by Deceased's Sister as Executrix Without Notifying the Daughter, Alleged to Have Mild Mental Retardation, Was Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
23 Oct 2018The petitioner, daughter of the deceased, sought revocation of probate granted to her aunt (respondent no.1) under Section 263 of the Indian Successio...
- 82
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against SAFEMA Forfeiture Based on Invalid Detention Order — Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Quashed as Representation Not Considered Before Revocation, Forfeiture Set Aside
8 Apr 2019The case involves a challenge to the forfeiture of properties under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976...
- 284
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration to Ramachandrapura Mutt. Petitioners Allege Violation of Rights as Registered Trust and Seek Restoration of Previous Board of Trustees Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.
10 Aug 2018Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging Government Order No. KAM.E.56 MU.A.B. ...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Revisional Order in Execution Proceedings. Decree Against Single Defendant Without Adjudication Held Null and Void Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 10, Rendering Execution Incompetent.
12 Jan 2024The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellants under section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking a permanent injunction aga...
- 348
