High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Pipeline Company Against Orders in Miscellaneous Petitions. Decision and Reasoning Not Included in Provided Excerpt.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI
  • 29
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The provided judgment text is a cause list and prayer portion of a High Court of Karnataka order dated 3rd March 2016, passed by Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri, dealing with multiple writ petitions filed by the Chairman of RGTI Ltd. (Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure) against various landowners and the Competent Authority. The writ petitions sought writs of certiorari under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution to quash orders passed by lower courts (Fast Track Court-II, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Principal District and Sessions Judge at Bidar) in miscellaneous petitions (Civil Misc. and Misc. Petition numbers) between August and November 2012. The lower court proceedings presumably arose under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, concerning compensation for pipeline right of user. However, the substantive judgment, including the court’s analysis, findings, and final order, is not reproduced in the excerpt. Therefore, the full facts, legal issues, arguments, and ratio decidendi are not available.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC030029112013_2

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (03) 40

Writ Petition No.103949/2013 C/W Writ Petition Nos.101106/2013, 84067/2012, 84068/2012, 84141/2012, 84142/2012, 87549/2012, 87597/2012, 87598/2012, 87599/2012, 102450/2013, 101226/2013, 102449/2013, 101107/2013, 101446/2013, 101228/2013, 101227/2013, 103961/2013, 103960/2013, 103959/2013, 103957/2013, 101216/2013, 101217/2013, 101218/2013, 101219/2013, 101220/2013, 101221/2013, 101222/2013, 101223/2013, 101224/2013, 101225/2013, 87043/2012, 102616/2013, 102617/2013, 102618/2013, 102619/2013, 102620/2013, 102621/2013, 102622/2013, 102623/2013, 102636/2013, 102637/2013, 102638/2013, 102639/2013, 102640/2013, 102774/2013, 102775/2013, 102776/2013, 102777/2013, 102778/2013, 102780/2013, 102781/2013, 102782/2013, 102783/2013, 102785/2013, 102786/2013, 102787/2013, 103946/2013, 103948/2013, 103952/2013, 103953/2013, 103958/2013, 103962/2013, 102788/2013, 102791/2013, 102792/2013, 102793/2013, 102794/2013, 103947/2013, 103950/2013, 103951/2013, 102624/2013, 102625/2013, 102635/2013, 102641/2013, 102779/2013, 102789/2013 & 102790/2013 (GM-RES)

2016-03-03

Ashok B. Hinchigeri

S.P. Shankar, Sudarshan M., S.V. Nisty, Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Santosh Biradar

The Chairman, RGTI Ltd., Pipe Line

Khasim Ali S/o Mastansab (in lead WP) and others; Competent Authority, Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought writ of certiorari to quash lower court orders in miscellaneous petitions.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was aggrieved by adverse orders passed by lower courts in miscellaneous petitions.

Previous Decisions

Lower courts (Fast Track Court-II, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Principal District and Sessions Judge at Bidar) passed orders in miscellaneous petitions between 01.08.2012 and 27.11.2012, which the petitioner sought to quash.

Procedural History

Respondent landowners filed miscellaneous petitions (likely under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act) before various courts in Bidar (Fast Track Court-II, Additional District Judge, Principal District and Sessions Judge) in 2010. The lower courts passed orders in 2012 adverse to the petitioner company. Aggrieved, the Chairman of RGTI Ltd. filed the present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking certiorari to quash those orders. The High Court consolidated the matters and passed an order on 3rd March 2016, but the substantive judgment is not provided.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Pipeline Company Against Orders in Miscellaneous Petitions. Decision and Reasoning Not Included in Provided Excerpt.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Considers Constitutional Validity of Section 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Act Inserted by Maharashtra Act XVI of 1995. Petitioners Challenge Retrospective Withdrawal of Sales Tax Deferral Incentives Under Package Scheme of Incentives,...