Search Results for "compensation exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "compensation exemption"

443 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 443 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Premium Demand on Entire Land in ULC Repeal Case — Demand Must Be Limited to Vacant Land Only. The Court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a premium demand for the entire land including built-up area is impermissible; only vacant land as per the exemption order can be subject to premium.

9 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Modern Paints, a partnership firm, acquired land in Oshiwara, Mumbai, under a conveyance dated 12 June 1975. On 1 August 1977, it file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

20 Mar 2018

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

14 Oct 2014

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Payment Order in License Fee Dispute — Sets Aside Direction to Pay Rs. 37.61 Lakhs Per Month Pending Trial. Court Holds That Order Under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC for Interim Payment Requires Admission of Liability or Undisputed Amounts, Not Determination of Disputed Claims.

1 Nov 2023

The Appellant, Kavis Fashions Private Limited, challenged an order dated 4 January 2021 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane, allowi...

High Court

High Court Rejects Remand Request in Land Acquisition Enhancement Appeal — Acquiring Body's Failure to File Written Statement After Being Allowed to Participate Does Not Warrant Remand. The Court Relied on the Principle That Mere Technicalities Cannot Defeat the Ends of Justice When the Party Had Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses.

2 Feb 2016

The first appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by the acquiring body, Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Builder's Appeal Against Execution Order in Consumer Dispute — Upholds State Commission's Order for Possession and Compensation. Builder's Appeal Challenging Execution of Final Order Dismissed for Lack of Merit and Non-Compliance with Earlier Directions.

9 May 2025

The case arises from a consumer complaint filed by Mr. Arunkumar Marimuthu (Respondent No.1) against M/s GM Infinite Dwelling (India) Pvt. Ltd. and it...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner with Valid Learner's Licence Not Liable for Compensation; Insurance Company Directed to Pay and Recover. Learner's Licence Held Valid Driving Licence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Breach of Rule 3 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Not Established as No Evidence of Contravention.

3 Feb 2025

The appellant, Ku. Nilima Dakhane, was the owner of a Kinetic Nova scooter involved in an accident on 10.04.2003, in which respondent No.2, Pandurang ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)