Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

231 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 231 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Can Compute Stamp Duty under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 without Waiting for Collector of Stamps; Section 27 Arbitration Act Petition Considered. Under Sections 33, 32A and 34 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Arbitral Tribunal has duty to impound instruments and may admit them on payment of duty and penalty computed by Tribunal.

30 Jul 2025

The Commercial Arbitration Petition arose before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. The petitioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Charterer in Arbitration Dispute Over Vessel Collision - Directs ONGC to Release Withheld Invoices and Maintain Status Quo on Bank Guarantee. The court held that the petitioner made out a strong prima facie case for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the contract did not permit withholding of payments for the collision incident.

6 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Ocean Sparkle Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim relief pending ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Award in Contract Dispute Over Liquidated Damages and Time as Essence of Contract. The Court held that time was not the essence of the contract for supply of pipes, and ONGC was entitled only to actual damages, not liquidated damages, under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Sections 34 and 37.

13 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard cross-appeals arising from arbitration proceedings between Welspun Specialty Solutions Limited (formerly Remi Metals ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes Four Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Filed Under Sections 11(6) and 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking Appointment of Substitute Arbitrator. Petitioners Contended That Arbitrators Appointed by CPWD Were Ineligible Under Section 12(5) for Want of Mandatory Consent.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt. Ltd., were awarded six construction contracts by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for works ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows PWD's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Road Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Damages Beyond 1% Cap Due to Contractor's Abandonment but Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 9% Simple.

12 Jun 2026

The case arises from three arbitration petitions filed by the Public Works Department (PWD) of Maharashtra under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Land Acquisition Dispute — Reference to Arbitration Directed Under Section 64 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Dispute over compensation for acquired land referred to arbitration as per statutory mechanism, rejecting objections of limitation and maintainability.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Rejection of Specific Performance and Damages in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Non-Compliance with Conditions Precedent and Lack of Proof of Damages Are Not Patently Illegal.

9 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Om Shiv Constructions, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Commercial Dispute. Petition Involves Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Allowing Rejection of Goods After Acceptance, Contrary to Section 42 of Sale of Goods Act.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioner, a manufacturing company, issued a purchase order to the respondent, a trading company, for the supply of stainless steel seamless tube...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute — Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Upheld Despite Appointment of Third Arbitrator by Appointing Authority. The court held that the appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without party consultation, is valid when one party fails to appoint its arbitrator, and the award on merits, including interest at 18% per annum, is not against public policy.

14 Sep 2010

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of the District Judge, Pune, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Jan 2019

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)