Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

662 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 662 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Application Due to Non-Existence of Arbitration Agreement — No Prima Facie Case for Reference to Arbitration Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jul 2026

The applicant, Unistar Metals Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of partnership deed and findings on dissolution, holding that reappreciation of evidence is not permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Yogendra N. Thakkar, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator.

10 Oct 2025

The applicant, Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an application under Sect...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Second Round of Arbitration — No Arbitration Agreement Survives After Award Set Aside Without Remand. The court held that after an arbitral award is set aside under Section 34 without any direction for de novo arbitration, the arbitration agreement does not revive for a fresh round of arbitration, and a pending Section 37 appeal does not alter this position.

10 Oct 2025

The dispute arose from an Agreement for Purchase of Salvage Material dated 29th November 2011 between Rajuram Sawaji Purohit, sole proprietor of M/s. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging Facilitation Council's Jurisdiction Under MSMED Act — Arbitration Agreement Not Barred by Section 18 of MSMED Act. The court held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, being a special statute, overrides the arbitration agreement between the parties, and the Facilitation Council has jurisdiction to refer the dispute to arbitration.

31 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a Central Public Sector Enterprise, entered into agreements with respondent No. 2, M/s. People Infoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.

30 Nov 2017

The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Under Section 11(4) of Arbitration Act for Appointment of Arbitrator When Tribunal Already Constituted. Petition Under Section 11(4) Not Maintainable Once Arbitral Tribunal is Constituted; Remedy Lies Under Section 15 of the Act for Substitution of Arbitrator.

7 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Transparent Energy Systems Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Orders in Arbitration Reference Dispute — Agreement Contained Arbitration Clause, Civil Suit Not Maintainable. Section 8(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Mandates Reference to Arbitration When Party to Agreement Invokes It Before First Statement on Substance of Dispute.

11 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Rashmi Solanki, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Senior C...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)