Search Results for "Vague pleadings"

891 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 891 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence After Plaintiff's Side Closed. Court Held That Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Evidence or to Remedy Negligence of Party.

The petitioner, Sri P. Ramaprasad, was the plaintiff in O.S. No. 231/2019 pending before the XIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough for Life Convict in Murder Case Despite Vague Witness Threat Claims. Furlough is a right, not a privilege, under the Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, and rejection based on general apprehension is unsustainable.

The petitioner, Archana Singh, wife of convict Virendra Thakur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Oral Agreement Not Proved. Plaintiff failed to establish oral agreement, payment of consideration, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendant nos. 2 to 4) challenged the judgment and decree dated 18/02/2014 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mum...