Search Results for "Trade union recognition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Trade union recognition"

636 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 636 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Denial of Promotion to Daily Wage Employees Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice. State Government's failure to promote daily wage Mazdoors to Karkun posts while promoting similarly situated employees violates Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Jul 2006

The case involves three writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra and three others challenging a common judgment and order dated 9th March 1994...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Reinstating Daily Wager Employees with Continuity of Service. The court upheld the finding that termination of employees who had worked for more than 240 days without following Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 constituted an unfair labour practice under the MRTU & PULP Act.

28 Feb 2025

The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary of Medical Education and Drugs Department, the Director of Medical Education and Research, and the Dea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by National Institute of Industrial Engineering Challenging Trade Union Registration. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for NITIE Under Section 2(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Allowing Union Registration Under MRTU & PULP Act.

4 Feb 2019

The case involves a writ petition filed by the National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE) challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.

30 Oct 2015

The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Challenging Industrial Court Order Directing Promotion of Qualified Employees with Retrospective Effect. Promotion of Unqualified Employee Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

21 Aug 2006

The petitioner, Rama Khobragade, an employee of the Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Board, challenged an order dated 14.07.1995 passed by the In...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practices Order. Settlement Clause Denying Benefits to Later-Recruited Workmen Held Invalid Under Proviso to Section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

11 Jan 2005

The matter arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by Ceat Ltd. challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding That Petitioner Was Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act — Transfer Order Not Challenged on Merits. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the petitioner, including supervision and administrative functions, excluded him from the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

28 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Jagannath Tale, along with 19 other employees, filed a complaint of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Disposes Common Judgment in 13 Writ Petitions Pertaining to Wrongful Non‑Regularization and Alleged Unfair Labour Practices. The Central Question Was Whether the Nagpur Municipal Corporation’s Conduct Toward Long‑Serving Safai Karmacharis Attracted Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and Entitled Them to Regularization Under the Model Standing Orders.

22 Dec 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 13 writ petitions arising from complaints under Section 28 of the Maharashtra R...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)