Search Results for "Suit Plot"

2666 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2666 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Real Estate Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mohammed Zain Khan, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute Over Title to Property — Decree of Specific Performance Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The appellant, The Pashmina Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition No.6998 of 2021 Addressing Consent Requirements Under MOFA for Construction on Amalgamated Land. The Court Framed Issues on Informed Consent Under Section 4 and Applicability of Section 7A of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.

Background: The case involves a dispute over construction of an additional building 'E' in the 'Eves Garden' housing scheme at Mundhawa, Pune. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellants Entitled to Possession of Suit Property Based on Title and Adverse Possession. Permissive occupation does not create ownership; respondent failed to prove adverse possession or valid title.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a suit plot and house. The original plaintiffs (now appellants) are the sons of Marotrao Dhobale, the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion for Interim Relief in Specific Performance Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Plaintiffs Failed to Make Out Prima Facie Case for Appointment of Receiver or Injunction.

The plaintiffs, M/s. Pride Associates and others, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 4th June 2005 for a property in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Land for Mosque, Upholds CIDCO's Decision. Allotment of plot for religious purpose is valid and not violative of secularism.

The Petitioner, Tanzimul Muslimin Society Sanpada, was allotted a plot of land by CIDCO for setting up a mosque. The allotment was approved by CIDCO's...