Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

297 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 169 Days. Bureaucratic Delays Not Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

18 Aug 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by the Sub Post Master, Gandhinagar, against Meenaben Bhaw...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal in Medical Negligence Case — Remands to State Commission for Fresh Consideration on Merits After Condoning Delay. Limitation Period for Appeal Calculated from Date of Receipt of Certified Copy, and Delay of 55 Days Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause.

31 Jul 2025

The case arises from a complaint of medical negligence and deficiency in service filed by Sh. Fateh Singh (the petitioner) against Delhi Commonwealth ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Case — State Commission Failed to Consider Compensation Amount. Compensation of Rs. 3,000 per day from 15.06.2021 till payment was not considered by State Commission in Appeal No. 129 of 2023.

18 Jun 2025

The case involves an appeal by Manoj Kumar against TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. and three others. The dispute arose from a complaint filed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

10 Feb 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition of Ex-Defense Personnel in Housing Allotment Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Prove Deficiency in Service by Mysore Urban Development Authority. Consumer Forums' Concurrent Findings Upheld as No Ground for Interference Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Sri. Lt. Gen (Retd) BNBM Prasad, an ex-defense personnel, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Motor Insurance Claim — National Commission Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact. Condition No. 4 of Insurance Policy Cannot Be Applied to Deny Claim When Vehicle Left Unattended Due to Justifiable Emergency.

13 Dec 2024

The appellant, Rajesh Kumar, owned a car insured by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. under a Private Car Insurance Policy with an Insured Declared Valu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

2 Dec 2022

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Wheeling Power to Own Units Is a Generating Company, Not Open Access Consumer, Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That Section 86(1)(f) Covers Disputes Between Licensees and Generating Companies, and the Appellant's Captive Power Plant Qualifies as a Generating Company.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Using Open Access to Wheel Power to Its Own Units Is a 'Generating Company' Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That the Term 'Generating Company' Includes a Captive Generating Plant and That Disputes Arising from Open Access Agreements for Wheeling Power to Own Units Fall Within the Arbitral Jurisdiction of the State Commission.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)