Search Results for "Separate Industrial Establishments"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union Petition as Infructuous Due to Merger of Petitioner Union. Petition challenging recognition of another union under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 becomes infructuous as petitioner union ceased to exist and no interim relief was granted.

The petitioner, All India Siemens Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, filed a writ petition in 2006 challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Status of Voluntary Health Workers as Workmen Entitled to Permanency. Municipal Corporation's Scheme of Voluntary Health Workers does not create a master-servant relationship, but workers are entitled to permanency under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of petitions concerns Voluntary Health Workers appointed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, particularly in relation to their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Challenge to Exemption Notifications Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act. Comparison of Benefits Must Be Holistic, Not Item-by-Item, to Determine if Exemption Is Justified.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi, a registered trade union representing private security guards, filed a writ petition challenging ...