Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

335 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 335 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Declaration Under Section 6 Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitles Landowner to Restoration of Possession.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land situated at Satara for the purpose of road widening. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitlement to Restoration of Possession.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the acq...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Fresh Acquisition Under 2013 Act Where Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 1894 Act Deemed Lapsed as Award Not Declared and Possession Not Taken, Violating Article 300-A Right to Property.

5 May 2026

The petitioner, Roshan Shrikant Tandel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the acquisition proceedings concerning his land...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Modification of Punishment in Conductor Misconduct Case. The court held that the Tribunal's reduction of punishment from stoppage of two increments to one increment with permanent effect was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Divisional Controller of a transport corporation, challenged an award dated 27.04.2022 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Vadodara in ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Bipartite Settlement and Pension Regulations. Employee Removed for Misconduct Entitled to Pension as Appellate Order Granting Terminal Benefits Attained Finality and He Completed Minimum Pensionable Service.

3 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from the removal of an employee from service by United Commercial Bank following a disciplinary enquiry that found him guilty of rio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Article 226 — Declaration That Acquisition Proceeding Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court held that failure to pass award within statutory period renders acquisition proceedings lapsed and entitles landowners to restoration of possession.

6 Apr 2023

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Satara district, challenged the acquisition of their lands by the State of Maharashtra for the Neera ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim by Muley Family Members — Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1968 Deemed Lapsed Due to Non-Completion and Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Officer directed to pass appropriate orders under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as the award was not made within two years of the declaration under Section 6.

18 Apr 2015

The petitioners, members of the Muley family, filed two writ petitions challenging the acquisition of their land, plot No.33/1, Sheet No.40A, Ward No....

High Court

KAHC010000842011_1

11 Jul 2014

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Civil Imprisonment Order for Contempt of Injunction Due to Lack of Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing. The court set aside the order of one month civil imprisonment passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No.331 of 1996, as the appellant was not given a proper opportunity to show cause before the order was passed.

6 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 23-09-2003 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, sentencing the appel...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)