Search Results for "Revenue Divisional Officer"

1083 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1083 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order for Enquiry Under Section 59(b) of MLRC. Sale of Watan Land After Re-grant on Old Tenure Requires Enquiry Regarding Permission Under Circular Dated 13 November 1979.

The case involves a challenge by the petitioners, Vishwanath Sahadu Wakhare and others, against an order dated 11 December 2020 passed by the Hon'ble ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entries in Mutation Proceedings — Holds That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Revenue Authorities Must Decide Based on Possession and Revenue Records, Not Title Disputes.

The petitioners, Navin Popatlal Shah and Nitin Sundraji Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Revenue Appeal Order and Demolition Notice — Mutation Entry Restored. The court held that the Land Revenue Code does not empower revenue authorities to order demolition and that mutation entries are presumptive evidence of possession, not title.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners and in possession of property surveyed under no.128/10 of Cavellosim Village, filed an application before the J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement for Irrigation Project — Petitioners Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Delayed Payment

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by landowners whose agricultural lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for minor irrig...