Search Results for "Retention Money"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Canal Excavation Work — Contractor's Claim for Payment for Work Done Partly Allowed. The court held that the contractor is entitled to payment for work actually done and measured, but the quantum must be proved by proper evidence.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Krishna Water Supply Project, against the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Purely Civil Nature of Dispute — Non-Payment of Dues Does Not Attract Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its office bearers against the order of the Allahabad High Court which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Currency Arbitral Award Enforcement Case. Twin Principles Laid Down: Date of Enforceability for General Conversion, Date of Deposit for Amounts Deposited in Court.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the correct date for converting a foreign currency arbitral award into Indian rupees for enforcement. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Excess Stamp Duty Paid by Company in Stamp Duty Refund Case — Respondents Directed to Refund Rs.10,11,810/- with Interest. Petitioner Entitled to Refund Under Section 48 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 as Claim Was Within Limitation and Excess Payment Admitted.

The petitioner, Dalmiya Cement Venture Limited, a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, got registered several lands...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...