Search Results for "Rent Control"

2015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Ejectment Suit — Landlord's Bonafide Need Not Proved. Tenant's eviction set aside as landlord failed to establish bonafide requirement under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged two civil suits for ejectment and possession filed by the respondents-landlords under Section 16(1)(g) of the Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Written Statement in Rent Suit Pending for 21 Years. Amendment Allowed Subject to Costs as No Irretrievable Prejudice Caused to Plaintiff.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Morarji Hariram (since deceased), filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Based on Bona Fide Need for Ultrasound Machine. Landlord's Need to Establish Unemployed Sons in Business Held Real and Bona Fide Under Rent Control Law.

The dispute pertains to an eviction suit filed by the appellant-landlord against the respondents-tenant for a house in Chatra, Jharkhand. The landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction for Nuisance Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Nuisance Under Section 13(1)(c) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Upheld.

The petitioner, original defendant Suklal Kalu Thorat (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a writ petition challenging the judgment dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Eviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Proper Notice Under Section 12(3) of the Bombay Rent Act. Landlord failed to prove valid termination of tenancy as notice under Section 12(3) was not served in accordance with law.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the original defendant, Subhash Sambhashiv Bona Pawar, challenging the judgment and order d...