Search Results for "Regular Civil Suit"

3622 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3622 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010792792011_1

Background: The dispute centered around two agricultural lands in Kenchanahalli village originally owned by one Siddagirigowda. His first wife Thopamm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Salt Land Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 4(2) of Salt Act, 1882. Exclusive Jurisdiction of Salt Commissioner Precludes Civil Court from Entertaining Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession of Salt Land.

The Union of India, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed a second appeal against the judgment of the District Judge, Thane, which confirmed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioner Not Properly Served, Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside. Service of Summons Found Insufficient Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, Suit Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

The petitioner, Vijay Mohan Jagtap, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the trial court in Regular Civil Suit No. 368/2007. The fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding Trial Court's Dismissal Due to Prior Partition and Wills. Properties Already Dealt With Under Prior Partition Deed (Ex.D-3) and Testamentary Succession (Ex.D-4, D-7) Leaving No Joint Family Property for Partition.

The litigation arose out of a suit for partition filed by the appellant, Smt. Jaywanthi K. Kapadia, who is one of the legal heirs of late A. Venilal. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular First Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Appeal fails as appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and no substantial question of law arose.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015...