Search Results for "Rashness and Negligence"

328 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's contributory negligence assessed at 50% for sitting on the footboard of a bus, reducing insurer's liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant, Gulam Mohammad, sustained injuries while traveling as a passenger in a bus owned by Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Inadequate Compensation for Injured Passenger. Negligent Driving by Bus Driver Leads to Enhanced Award of Rs. 6,00,000 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Harilal Valjibhai Parmar, was a passenger in a private luxury bus on 15 May 2005 when the bus, driven rashly and negligently at high sp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Minor Pedestrian. The court held that the insurer failed to prove breach of policy conditions or contributory negligence, affirming the Tribunal's award under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 30th December 2009 at about 7:10 a.m. on Dr. B.A. Road, Mumbai. The claimant, Mast. Siddanth Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by KTC in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs. 5,52,000 awarded to widow and children of deceased van driver, with income assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month, multiplier 16, and 50% future prospects.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and minor children of Francisco Da Costa, who died in a collision between a Maruti van ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Remands for Fresh Adjudication on Negligence and Compensation.

The appellant, Ashwinbhai Natvarlal Bhoi, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Stalking and Rash Driving Case Due to Material Contradictions and Ante-Dated Witness Statements. Conviction under Sections 279, 354D, 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Ingredients of Stalking and Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Rakesh Matasharan Shukla challenging his conviction by the Trial Court and upheld by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased Driver's Risk Statutorily Covered Under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Wasim Maheboobbhai Bhayani, was driving a luxury bus (GJ-03-W-9841) on 04.12.2017 wh...