Search Results for "Railway Rates Tribunal jurisdiction"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Execution Court Orders in Arbitral Award Enforcement — Calculation of Amount Payable Under Award Upheld

The Petitioner, Konkan Railway Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a public sector undertaking, awarded a construction contract to the Respondent, M/s. B. T. Patil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.

The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court of Bombay: Commercial Arbitration Appeal" "Exploring the scope of judicial review under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, addressing readiness, willingness, and compensation issues in a shareholder dispute."

Arbitration Scope: The Court clarified the restrictive jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing minim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates TDS Obligations of Turf Clubs on Stake Money Payments to Horse Owners under Income Tax Act. Interpretation of Section 194B and CBDT Circulars Central to Dispute over Characterization of Stake Money as Winnings.

The case involved writ petitions filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited, Mysore Race Club Limited, Karnataka Race Horse Owners Association, and an indiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...