Search Results for "Promoter Developer"

295 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 295 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition for Demolition of Deviated Construction. Petition by Grace Gnanambal Seeks Direction to Corporation to Demolish Building at Madippakkam.

The matter involves two writ petitions before the High Court of Madras. In WP No.8453 of 2024, the petitioner Mrs. Grace Gnanambal sought a direction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction on Construction. Court holds that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting ad-interim injunction without considering balance of convenience and prima facie case.

The petitioner, Radhika Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Society's Refusal to Grant Membership to Purchaser of Premises. Registered Sale Deed Holder Entitled to Membership Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Despite Developer's Objection.

The petitioners, Apna Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...