Search Results for "Plausible Findings"

824 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 824 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Restores Acquittal in Murder Case Due to High Court's Erroneous Reversal. The High Court failed to apply the plausible view test and wrongly shifted the burden of proof onto the accused, contrary to settled law.

The appellants, father and son, were prosecuted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for allegedly assaulting the deceased with pipes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Goa Rent Act. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Personal Occupation Upheld as Genuine and Based on Evidence.

The petitioners, Michael Anthony William Gareth and Amelia Gareth, were tenants in a house bearing Municipal no. 73, Panaji, Goa, which was acquired b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Guarantee and Pledge Against Company Pending Company Law Board Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Assumption of Liability by Directors Without Shareholder Consent Raises Serious Questions to be Tried.

The applicant, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra, filed an application in a pending company appeal seeking an interim injunction to restrain HDFC Bank from reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...