Search Results for "Partnership Dissolution"

169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms Interim Maintenance for Wife and Son in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Frames Guidelines on Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Other Enactments to Ensure Uniformity and Consistency.

The case arises from an application for interim maintenance filed by the wife and minor son under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The wife left the matrimonial ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Proprietary Rights Over Trademark 'Suratee Tobacco Company'. The Court held that the plaintiff, as a partner, cannot claim exclusive ownership of the partnership trademark without proving dissolution and assignment.

The appellant, Syed Zakirali, filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from passing off their goods as those of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit in Joint Hindu Family Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court and First Appellate Court Decrees. The court held that the plaintiff proved the existence of joint family business and properties, and the suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

The case involves a dispute over partition of Joint Hindu Family properties. The plaintiff, Premsukh, filed a suit for partition and separate possessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Partnership Dispute — Status Quo Ordered on Firm Properties Pending Arbitration. Court records statements from parties not to alienate partnership properties, directing status quo to preserve subject matter of arbitration.

The petitioners, Taz Naval Nariman and Rukhsshana Meher Anklesaria, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....