Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

216 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Writ Challenging Seizure of Vehicle for Transporting Gitti; Holds Gitti is Minor Mineral Requiring Royalty and Transit Pass under Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 2013. Transportation Without Valid Secondary Transport Pass and GPS Justifies Seizure and Penalty, and Petitioner's Lack of Clean Hands Bars Relief.

28 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a transporter, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, aggrieved by the sei...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Allotment Under KIAD Act, Upholding Allotment to Highest Bidder. Petitioner's Claim to Land as Successor to Mining Lease Rejected as Previous Court Orders Concluded Against It and Allotment Was Lawful Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Katwa Udyog Limited (KUL) challenging the allotment of land measuring 305 acres and 7 guntas at Na...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Complaint Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Complaint Filed by Geologist Without Prior Sanction from Central or State Government is Not Maintainable.

14 Oct 2022

The petitioner, M/S SVB Stone Crushers, a partnership firm represented by its partner Sri K H Suresh, filed a writ petition under Section 482 read wit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Mandatory Three-Month Pre-Expiry Renewal Application for Stone Crusher Licences. Court Holds That Section 4(1) of Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 Is Not Arbitrary or Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Mar 2020

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard five connected writ petitions filed by proprietors and a partner of stone crushing units in Chamarajana...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows JSPL to Transport Iron Ore from SMPL's Lease Area Despite Expired Environmental Clearance. Mining Operations Definition Under Section 3(d) of MMDRA Does Not Include Transportation of Already Mined Minerals, Affirming High Court's Writ of Mandamus.

14 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the State of Odisha against the Orissa High Court's order directing the State to grant transport permi...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Challenge to Mines and Minerals Amendment Act 2015 as Academic Without Substantive Relief. Constitutional validity of auction-based grant of mining leases under Section 11 and ineligibility of pending applications under Section 10A not entertained as petitioner sought no consequential relief.

18 Jun 2019

The petitioner, M/S. MSPL Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand for ₹215.75 Crores for Unlawful Mining of Iron Ore. Petitioner's Mining Lease Renewal Deemed Granted Under Section 8(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Extraction Was Lawful.

23 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s Deepchand Kishenlal, a registered partnership firm, held a mining lease originally granted in 1954 for manganese ore and kaolin, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging State's Power to Collect Royalty on Minor Minerals. State Government has authority to impose penalty for default in payment of royalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1963.

18 Jul 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging the power of the State Government of Maharashtra to collect royalty on minor minerals and to impo...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

2 Aug 2013

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal, Holding Royalty Payment for Mining Lease is Revenue Expenditure. Yearly royalty of Rs. 96,000 under mining arrangement with Government deductible under Income-tax Act as it relates to raw material obtained, not capital outlay.

15 Nov 1965

This appeal arose from income tax assessment proceedings for the years 1954-55 to 1956-57. The appellant, a registered firm manufacturing lime from li...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)