Search Results for "Maharashtra Civil Services (Small Family) Rules, 2005"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unnatural Conduct of Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 506 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rahul Limbaji Thorat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of his wife Vandana under Sections 302 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires.

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Notification Including Jat Community in Central Backward Classes List as Union Cabinet Rejected NCBC Advice Without Adequate Consideration. Inclusion by Notification Dated 04.03.2014 Violates Statutory Scheme Under National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993.

The present group of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution challenged a Notification dated 04.03.2014 issued by the Union of India, whic...