Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

519 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 519 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order — Employee Entitled to CRTE Under Kalelkar Settlement. Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU & PULP Act for Failure to Convert NMR Employee to Regular Establishment After Five Years.

1 Feb 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of the Industrial Court dated 04.08.2008 in Complaint (ULP) N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders in Labour Dispute — Upholds Interim Relief Granted to Union Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief Without First Deciding Maintainability of Complaint.

19 Oct 2015

The case involves four writ petitions filed by industrial companies (M/s Saklecha Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M/s Sudesh Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders Dismissing Unfair Labour Practice Complaints; Directs Reinstatement Due to Victimization and Discriminatory Treatment. Termination of Project Affected Persons Found Illegal Under Items (a), (b) and (d) of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act for Retrospective Effect and Failure to Reconsider Despite Production of Competent Authority Certificate.

13 Apr 2017

The writ petitions arose from the dismissal of complaints under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Failed to Justify Bypassing Senior Employee for Promotion. Non-communication of adverse remarks and lack of evidence led to finding of unfair labour practice under Item 5 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

8 Jan 2010

The petitioner, the Divisional Officer of the Maharashtra State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd., Nagpur, challenged the order of the Industrial...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reappointment of Conductor in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Labour Court's Discretion to Grant Reappointment as Fresh Appointee Upheld Despite Misconduct of Ticketless Travel. The court held that the Labour Court's order directing reappointment as a fresh appointee under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 was not perverse and no interference was warranted.

13 Jun 2019

The petitioners, the Divisional Controller and Divisional Traffic Superintendent of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the judgm...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition by College Director Challenging Reinstatement of Daily Wager — Termination Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Director of Shri Guru Govind Singhji College of Engineering and Technology, Vishnupuri, Nanded, challenged the judgment and order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Trainee Worker in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment or Non-Completion of Training Leads to Confirmation of Labour Court Orders Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

17 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s Z.F. Steering Gears (India), challenged the order of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 1.1.2006, which confirmed the Labour Court'...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Former Employees of Wellman Hindustan Limited Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unpaid Wages Under MRTU and PULP Act

24 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard multiple connected writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of a complaint filed by former employees...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Territorial Jurisdiction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Filed by Union for Employee Posted Outside Maharashtra. The Court held that the Industrial Court under MRTU & PULP Act has jurisdiction if the employer's establishment is within Maharashtra, even if the employee works outside the state.

22 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, M/s. Abbott India Ltd., a pharmaceutical company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and its officer Mr. Jitendra Wadhw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Maharashtra State Electricity Board Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Contractual Employees. Employer's failure to confer permanency on telephone operators working since 1996 constitutes unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

4 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged a common judgment and order of the Industrial Court, which allowed complaints f...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)