KAHC030058022017_1
13 Jul 2023A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...
Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"
534 result(s) found
Found 534 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Maharashtra Police Academy Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Held that the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as the petitioner is not an 'industry' under the Act.
15 Oct 2025The present Writ Petition was filed by the Maharashtra Police Academy (Petitioner) challenging the Judgment dated 09.02.2025 passed by the Industrial ...
- 79
High Court
Madras High Court Quashes Preliminary Enquiry Notice Against Joint Commissioner of Labour Based on Anonymous Complaint. Reference for Vigilance Enquiry on Anonymous Letter Violates Government Guidelines in G.O.Ms.No.173 Dated 19.12.2018.
25 Jun 2026The petitioner, P. Subramanian, is a Joint Commissioner of Labour in Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, and is due for promotion as Additional Commissione...
- 40
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Deliberates on Employment Status of Contract Workers in Statutory Canteens Under Factories Act. The Court Examines Whether Workers Engaged by Contractor to Run Canteen Required Under Section 46 Are Deemed Employees of Principal Employer.
1 Aug 2026The appeals arose from a dispute over the employment status of casual workers employed by a contractor to run a canteen at Air India's premises. The c...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge by Sugar Factory Against Industrial Court Order Granting Permanent Status to Workers. The Court considers the legality of appointments, staffing pattern, and binding nature of settlement under Section 42 of Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946.
9 Jan 2020The writ petition before the Bombay High Court arose from an order passed by the Industrial Court at Kolhapur in a complaint of unfair labour practice...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ICAR and NRCC, Upholds State Government as Appropriate Government for Labour Dispute. Jurisdiction of Labour Court under MRTU & PULP Act Confirmed for Termination of Agricultural Labourers Employed by Central Government Undertaking.
23 Nov 2010The case involves an appeal by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the National Research Centre for Citrus (NRCC) against a judgmen...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Interim Relief Against Dismissal in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court and Industrial Court Correctly Refused to Restrain Employer from Issuing Punishment Order at Second Show Cause Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
8 Nov 2019The petitioner, Dhanraj Gaikwad, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 2008. He was charge-sheet...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award Granting Permanency to Compassionate Appointees of Air India Ltd. — Record Note Does Not Confer Right to Permanency. The Court held that compassionate appointments under the Record Note dated 26 March 1992 were contractual and did not create a right to permanency, and that the Tribunal erred in directing permanency with full backwages without considering the terms of the Record Note or the financial condition of the employer.
24 Jan 2024The case involves a writ petition filed by Air India Ltd. (AIL) challenging an Award dated 6 March 2018 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tr...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Dispute Over Termination of a Medical Practitioner — Finds Hospital's Termination Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court Modified Back Wages to 50% for the Period from Termination to Labour Court Award and Full Back Wages Thereafter.
5 Apr 2011The case involves a dispute between N.M. Wadia Charitable Trust Hospital, Solapur (appellant) and Dr. Ashok Vyankatesh Apte (respondent), a full-time ...
- 271
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Dismissal of ULP Complaints; Voluntary Resignation Scheme Not Retrenchment Under Section 25H ID Act. Workers' Claim for Re-employment Rejected as Agreement Dated 05.12.1991 Was Not a Settlement Under BIR Act.
8 Apr 2010The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, dismissed two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution by former employees of Sunrise ...
- 34
