Search Results for "ITAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "ITAT order"

531 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 531 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Assets Received from AE Not Taxable Under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act. The court held that assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration are not taxable as perquisite under Section 28(iv) as they are not in the nature of 'benefit' arising from business or profession.

28 Jul 2025

The Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Development Agreement — Receipt of Rs.1,00,92,750/- Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in interpreting the development agreement and that the compensation for settlement of dispute was a capital receipt under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

19 Apr 2024

The appeal was filed by Sunil Pran Sikand, legal heir of Pran Kishan Sikand, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 20th S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year Limit Without Proper Sanction Held Invalid. Reassessment Notice Quashed as Approval Under Section 151 Was Granted by Incompetent Authority and No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Was Established.

13 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Ashok Chaganlal Thakkar, an individual, had invested in parcels of land at Ardhe and Aase in Taluka Karjat, District Raigad. During th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Section 80IA Deduction for Infrastructure Development. The Court held that the Assessee, engaged in construction of commercial assets, was not eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the activity did not constitute 'infrastructure facility'.

5 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune) against a common order dated 25th November 2016 passed by the Inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Section 80IA(4) Deduction Case for Warehousing Corporation. Assessee's warehousing facility held to be part of port infrastructure eligible for deduction under Income Tax Act, 1961.

9 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune, which a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act. ITAT Correctly Held That Loans to Assessee Were Not Covered as Deemed Dividend Since Lender Companies Had No Accumulated Profits.

8 Feb 2019

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 20th Fe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue's Appeal Partly Allowed by ITAT in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 221(1) Excludes Interest. The Court held that penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is leviable only on the tax amount, not on interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax-8) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Deduction under Section 48(1) and Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as payments to sisters and nieces were for clearing overriding title and investment in REC bonds was within time.

4 Sep 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Raymond Ltd. Tax Case — Multiple Disallowances Deleted by ITAT Upheld. Pre-operative expenses, technical know-how payments, debenture issue costs, and lease rent deductions allowed as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.

21 Mar 2012

The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai (Revenue) appealed against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 22 March 2007 for A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Deductions for Gift Expenditure, Entertainment Expenses, Debenture Premium, and Investment Allowance. The court held that the assessee's claims were allowable under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and no substantial question of law arose.

25 Mar 2010

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)