Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue's Appeal Partly Allowed by ITAT in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 221(1) Excludes Interest. The Court held that penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is leviable only on the tax amount, not on interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax-8) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowing the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] order. The respondent-assessee, M/s. Oryx Finance and Investment Pvt. Ltd., had its income tax return processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, resulting in a demand of Rs.1,64,90,573/- and a penalty of Rs.1,19,30,677/- imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 221(1) for default in payment of the demand. The assessee appealed to the CIT(A), who deleted the penalty on the ground that interest component must be excluded while levying penalty under Section 221(1), and since the penalty exceeded the tax component, the penalty order was set aside. The Revenue appealed to the ITAT, which held that while levying penalty under Section 221(1), the interest component is not to be considered, and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to quantify the penalty in accordance with Section 221(1). The Revenue then appealed to the High Court, framing two substantial questions of law: whether the ITAT was justified in holding that penalty under Section 221(1) is to be imposed only on tax excluding interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, without appreciating that Section 221(1) does not contain such a condition; and whether the ITAT was justified in remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer. The High Court, after hearing both sides, dismissed the appeal, holding that the ITAT's order was correct and that penalty under Section 221(1) is leviable only on the tax amount, excluding interest. The Court found no substantial question of law arose and upheld the ITAT's order.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Penalty under Section 221(1) - Scope of Default Amount - The issue was whether penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be levied on the entire demand including interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, or only on the tax component. The Court held that the penalty under Section 221(1) is leviable only on the tax amount, excluding interest, as the section does not include interest in the default amount. The Tribunal's order remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer to quantify penalty in accordance with law was upheld. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be imposed on the total demand including interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, or only on the tax component.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arises. The ITAT's order was correct that penalty under Section 221(1) is leviable only on the tax amount, excluding interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to quantify penalty in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act
  • 1961 is leviable only on the tax amount
  • excluding interest components under Sections 234A
  • 234B
  • and 234C
  • the section does not provide for penalty on interest
  • the Assessing Officer must quantify penalty in accordance with law.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017:BHC-OS:7656-DB

Income Tax Appeal No. 01 of 2015

2017-07-01

S.V. Gangapurwala, G.S. Kulkarni

2017:BHC-OS:7656-DB

Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant, Mr. Vishnu S. Hadade for the Respondent

The Commissioner of Income Tax-8

M/s. Oryx Finance and Investment Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Revenue against ITAT order regarding penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside ITAT order and restore penalty on entire demand including interest.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by ITAT order holding that penalty under Section 221(1) is to be imposed only on tax excluding interest.

Previous Decisions

Assessing Officer imposed penalty of Rs.1,19,30,677/- under Section 221(1); CIT(A) deleted penalty; ITAT partly allowed Revenue's appeal, remitting matter to Assessing Officer to quantify penalty excluding interest.

Issues

Whether penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be imposed on the total demand including interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, or only on the tax component.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that Section 221(1) does not contain any condition that penalty should be a percentage of only tax excluding interest. Respondent-assessee supported ITAT order that penalty is leviable only on tax amount.

Ratio Decidendi

Penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is leviable only on the tax amount, excluding interest components under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, as the section does not include interest in the default amount.

Judgment Excerpts

The ITAT held that while levying penalty under Section 221(1) of the Act interest component is not to be considered and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer with the direction to quantify the amount of penalty in accordance with provisions of Section 221(1) of the Act.

Procedural History

Assessing Officer imposed penalty under Section 221(1) for default in payment of demand. Assessee appealed to CIT(A), which deleted penalty. Revenue appealed to ITAT, which partly allowed Revenue's appeal, holding that interest component is excluded and remitted matter to Assessing Officer. Revenue then appealed to High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 143(1), 221(1), 234A, 234B, 234C
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of District Nodal NGO for Community Based Monitoring Project — No Arbitrariness Found in State's Decision. The court held that judicial review is limited to the decision-making process and ...