Search Results for "Gold Seizure"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for Smothering and Staging Fire. High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Trial Verdict.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 6th January, 2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in Sessions Trial No.59 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Adjudicates Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code. Prosecution Relied on Circumstantial Evidence of Blood Stains and Recovery of Vehicle to Link Accused to Murder.

The criminal appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant Paramjitsingh @ Kake for the murder of Jagmitsingh @ Goldi Marwa and causing disappeara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Accused in Smuggling Case; Customs Officers Held Not to Be Police Officers Under Section 25 Evidence Act. Confessional Statements to Customs Officers Admissible; No Violation of Article 20(3) as Accused Not Formally Accused During Inquiry Stage.

The Assistant Collector of Customs filed a complaint against Romesh Chandra Mehta and four others for conspiracy under section 120-B of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Sections 395, 397, 457, 380, 342, 427 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused and recovery of stolen articles.

The appellant, Polisha Ganpat Pawar, was convicted by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik on April 12, 2002 in Sessions Case No.175 of 2001 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Proof of Knowledge. Conviction under Sections 411 and 412 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that appellants knew or had reason to believe the recovered ornaments were proceeds of dacoity.

The appellants, Ashok Suryabhan Kale and Bhausaheb Suryabhan Kale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partly Abates Appeals and Hears Remaining Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping Under Section 365 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted 13 Accused for Abduction and Wrongful Confinement; No Final Disposition Available in Extracted Text.

The proceedings arose from FIR dated 13 November 1998 registered at Police Station Ashti, alleging that on 9 November 1998, the complainant Japan Raja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing daughter-in-law set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hirabai Dadarao @ Shrikant Patole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of her daughter-in-law Anita un...