Case Note & Summary
The criminal appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant Paramjitsingh @ Kake for the murder of Jagmitsingh @ Goldi Marwa and causing disappearance of evidence under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The incident occurred on 23 August 2011, when the deceased, a handicapped person, went missing. His body was found the next morning in a jungle area near Gorewada Ring Road, tied in a cotton bag. Investigation led to the appellant, who was a tenant in a house owned by the deceased's family. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the last seen together, blood stains found in the appellant’s rented house, a disclosure statement leading to the recovery of the vehicle used to transport the body, and matching cotton string. The trial court convicted the appellant and acquitted his mother. The appellant challenged the conviction before the High Court. The legal issues centered on the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The arguments of the parties are not recorded in the available text. The High Court's analysis and final decision are not provided in the excerpted portion of the judgment.
Issue of Consideration
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.431 OF 2014.
Case Details
2016 LawText (BOM) (08) 194
Criminal Appeal No. 431 of 2014
B.R. Gavai, V.M. Deshpande
R.K. Tiwari, M.J. Khan, D.M. Dixit
Paramjitsingh @ Kake s/o Harteksingh Soundh
The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Gittikhadan, Distt. Nagpur
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence.
Remedy Sought
The appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.
Filing Reason
Aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction passed by Additional Sessions Judge-10, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.312 of 2012.
Previous Decisions
The trial court convicted the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment and fine, while acquitting his co-accused mother.
Issues
Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and whether the trial court erred in convicting the appellant.
Judgment Excerpts
The appellant, being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction passed by Additional Sessions Judge – 10, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial No.312 of 2012 is before this Court.
the dead body was of a male person aged about 30 to 32 years. His clothes were stained with blood. The legs of the said person were tied to his neck with a cotton string.
Blood stains were noticed on the bed sheet. On the mattress also blood stains were noticed.
After recording the statement of the witnesses in the Police Station, Police Inspector Bahadure again went to Chalks Colony.
Procedural History
The appellant was tried along with his mother in Sessions Trial No.312 of 2012 before the Additional Sessions Judge-10, Nagpur. The trial court acquitted the mother but convicted the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 IPC on (date not mentioned). The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 431 of 2014 before the High Court.
Acts & Sections
- Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 201, 34
