Search Results for "GST Tribunal"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Tax Dispute Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 — Petitioner's Declaration Wrongly Rejected as Ineligible. Designated Committee's Notice in Form SVLDRS-3 Quashed for Non-Compliance with Scheme Provisions.

The Petitioner, Ashwini Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Petition in GST Appeal Due to Vague Reasons and Lack of Credible Evidence. Delay of 418 Days in Filing Writ Appeal Not Explained with Sufficient Particulars or Medical Records.

The case involves a petition filed by Tvl. SK Knit Apparels, a partnership firm, seeking condonation of a 418-day delay in filing a Writ Appeal before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Reassessment Notice Invalid Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure. Arbitration Award Receipt Held as Capital Receipt, Not Income Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Ramona Pinto, an individual, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 2nd April 2018 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order in Service Tax Case — Limitation Bar Not Applicable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds when the appeal was filed within the prescribed period under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, M/s. Practice Strategic Communications India Private Limited, a company providing management services, was issued a show cause notice ...