Search Results for "Food Analyst"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Where Food Was Substandard but Not Unsafe. Substandard food attracts only penalty under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, not criminal conviction under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the Food Inspector against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Surat, dated 05.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Where Food Was Substandard but Not Unsafe. Substandard food attracts only penalty under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, not conviction under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the Food Inspector against the judgment and order dated 05.10.2010 passed by the learned Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Director in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Non-executive director cannot be held liable under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 without specific averments of being in charge of business.

The applicant, Devendra Vinaykant Sheth, was original accused No. 7 in R.C.C. No. 686 of 2004 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Municipal Corporation of Amravati filed a criminal writ petition challenging the acquittal of the respondents in a case under the Prevention of Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 14 and Section 13(2) of PFA Act. Benefit of Doubt Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Proper Stirring of Oil Sample and Timely Intimation of Right to Get Sample Analyzed.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment dated 27-11-2002 in Regular Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Drugs Case Due to Procedural Lapse — Failure to Timely Invoke Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act Renders CDL Report Inadmissible, but State Did Not Challenge on That Ground.

The State of Goa filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents (M/s Caryl Pharma, its proprietor G.P. Pillai, M/s Ce-Chem Pharmaceuticals, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 for Mixing and Dividing Sample Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Girishkumar A. Dedhia, by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Discrepancies in Evidence of Food Inspectors and Failure to Obtain Panch Signature on Samples Led to Acquittal Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate, F.C. Kudal, in Regular Criminal Case No. 73 of 198...