Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1578 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1578 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claim for Exported Biscuits Despite Exemption Notification — Revenue Cannot Retain Duty Paid Without Authority of Law. The court held that exemption notification No.3/2006-CE is not applicable to exported goods as retail sale price in rupees is not required on export packages, and duty paid is validly claimable as rebate under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

21 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Parle Products Ltd., is a company engaged in manufacturing biscuits and confectioneries. Biscuits are excisable goods under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Distillery Licence Cancellation in Maharashtra Prohibition Act Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Show-Cause Notice Did Not Specify Grounds for Cancellation. The court held that cancellation of a distillery licence without proper notice and opportunity to be heard is unsustainable under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949.

28 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Shri Saikrupa Sugar & Allied Industries Ltd., a company running a sugar factory and distillery plant in Hiradgaon, challenged the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Limitation Bar. Demand for Excise Duty on Gates and Hoists Supplied to Irrigation Department Held Time-Barred Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944.

1 Dec 2021

The appellant, Water Resources Development (formerly Irrigation Department), was engaged in manufacturing mechanical gates, parts, and hoists for dams...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

10 Oct 2018

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Not Payable Without Specific Provision. Held that Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to Additional Duties under ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, and interest cannot be levied in absence of charging provision.

17 Jul 2017

The appellant, Indo Swiss Embroidery Industries Limited, is engaged in manufacturing embroidered grey fabrics classified under Chapter Sub Heading 580...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Cenvat Credit and Valuation Issues Decided. Classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and eligibility for Cenvat Credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 determined based on functional use and technical literature.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Rebate Claim as Time-Barred Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act — Export Date Determines Limitation Period, Filing of ARE-1 Not a Substitute for Rebate Claim.

29 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Everest Flavours Ltd., exported a consignment of 360 drums containing Menthol Crystals to Bangkok on 12 February 2006. The shipping bi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

10 Feb 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellat...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)