Search Results for "Employees Compensation Act 1923"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Employees Compensation Act 1923"

249 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals by Zilla Panchayat in Workmen's Compensation Cases — Employer-Employee Relationship Not Established. Commissioner's Award Set Aside as Claimants Failed to Prove That Deceased Were Employees of Zilla Panchayat Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

28 Jun 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Chief Secretary of Zilla Panchayat, Belgaum, under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act Due to Abatement Against Employer. Appeal against insurer cannot be entertained in absence of employer/owner of vehicle as primary liability rests on employer.

20 Feb 2023

The appellant, Tajoddin Shaikh, filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, alleging that he was employed as a cleaner on truck No. MH-2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Manufacturer in Workmen's Compensation Case — No Substantial Question of Law Raised Under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The appellant failed to formulate any substantial question of law, leading to dismissal of the appeal against the Labour Court's award of compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased workman.

8 Apr 2010

The appellant, Mahindra Gujrat Tractor Ltd., challenged an award dated 12th January 2007 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act & J...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Employer's Liability for Workman's Death by Assault at Construction Site Under Employees' Compensation Act, 1923. Assault by strangers during working hours constitutes an accident arising out of and in the course of employment, and the employer is liable to pay compensation under Section 3 of the Act.

26 Jul 2019

The case involves a writ petition filed by Somu, the landlord of a construction site, challenging an order dated 13.05.2015 passed by the IX Additiona...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Workmen's Compensation Cases — Cleaners Held to Be Employees of Lorry Owner, Not Gratuitous Passengers. The court upheld the Commissioner's finding that the cleaners were workmen under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the insurance company was liable to indemnify the owner.

1 Dec 2020

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed five appeals under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer's Admission of Employment and Accident Not Sufficient to Deny Compensation Without Cross-Examination. Commissioner's Dismissal of Claim for Want of Proof Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Under Employees' Compensation Act, 1923.

18 Sep 2014

The appellant, Shri Ravjibhai Chhotubhai Waghela, filed a claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, alleging that he was employed as a driver...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Mother's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case, Holds Son's Employment with Father Covered Under Act. The court set aside the Commissioner's order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on quantum of compensation under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

8 May 2012

The appellant, Smt. Lata Ramchandra Ubale, mother of the deceased Lalit Ramchandra Ubale, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner for Wo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Principal Employers in Workmen's Compensation Case, Holding That Contractor's Employee Not a 'Workman' Under the Act. The court set aside the Commissioner's award of compensation and penalty, finding that the deceased was employed by a contractor and not by the appellants.

9 Mar 2023

The appeal was filed by Gowardhan Madanlal Agrawal and Shantabai Gowardhandas Agrawal, owners of a shop complex and residential flats at Jaisthambha C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Supervisor Held to be Workman Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Deceased working as loader in goods lorry is a 'workman' under Section 2(1)(n) of the Act, and the employer-employee relationship was established.

19 Nov 2024

The case involves an appeal filed by the Oriental Insurance Company against an award of compensation by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Appellant held liable as employer under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for death of employees; insurance company directed to pay and recover from appellant.

9 Jan 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Krishnagangaa Consultants, a contractor, against the order of the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compens...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)