Search Results for "Divisional Railway Manager"

265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Railway Demand for Electricity and Water Charges — Disputed Facts Require Civil Adjudication. Contractual Liability for Infrastructure Costs Cannot Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The appellant, M. Arivudai Nambi, was a Halt Agent under an agreement with the Southern Railway. The Divisional Commercial Manager issued a demand on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute — Contractual Obligation Not Imposed by Tender. Amendment of law does not automatically entitle contractor to reimbursement of service tax paid after contract execution.

The appellant, M/s. Jyothy Fabricare Service Ltd., filed a writ appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge dismissing its writ petitions seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of RPF Constables for Unauthorized Absence — Holds Punishment Disproportionate. Long Unblemished Service of 17-18 Years Considered; Reinstatement Ordered Without Back Wages Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioners, Sadanand Mishra and Sitla Prasad Shukla, were former Constables in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) under the Union of India. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Deceased Passenger's Dependents. Court holds that mere absence of onward ticket does not disprove bonafide passenger status when death occurred due to fall from train.

The Union of India, through the General Manager of Central Railway, appealed against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Seniority Order in Railway Promotion Dispute. Seniority for Promotion to Non-Selection Post Determined by Date of Passing Trade Test Under Paragraph 315 of Indian Railway Establishment Manual.

The petitioner, Shri Prakash Narayanrao Kolhe, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 07.06.2000 which held that respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...