High Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railway Accident Case, Reversing Tribunal's Finding on Untoward Incident. Death from Accidental Fall During Travel with Valid Ticket Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989, as Exclusion for Own Criminal Act Under Section 124A(c) Not Applicable Without Evidence of Trespassing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989, filed by the daughter of a deceased passenger. The deceased, a housemaid, was traveling from Nallasopara to Santacruz with a valid season pass on December 28, 2010, when she fell from the train and died. The Railway Claims Tribunal rejected the claim, finding the incident did not constitute an 'untoward incident' as defined under the Act, based on railway documents suggesting the deceased was knocked down while crossing the track. The Tribunal had, however, accepted the deceased was a bonafide passenger. The appellant challenged this rejection, arguing the death resulted from an accidental fall during travel. The respondent Railways defended the Tribunal's order, relying on documents like the Station Master's Report, inquest panchnama, Police Report, and Divisional Railway Manager's Report to allege trespassing and invoke exclusion clauses under Section 124A(c) for 'own criminal act'. The High Court analyzed the evidentiary value of these documents. It noted the Station Master's initial report did not specify a cause, stating 'not known', while subsequent reports contained contradictions and were based on incorrect facts. The Court held the Tribunal erred in inferring trespassing from the nature of injuries without medical expert evidence, as it lacked expertise for such conclusions. Regarding the exclusion clauses, the Court found no evidence the deceased entered the railway without authority or committed a criminal act under Section 147, making Section 124A(c) inapplicable. The Court concluded the death resulted from an accidental fall during travel, constituting an untoward incident. It allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and directed compensation of Rs. 4,00,000 with 6% interest from the accident date, subject to a cap of Rs. 8,00,000, to be paid within 12 weeks of application.

Headnote

A) Railway Law - Compensation Claims - Untoward Incident Definition - Railways Act, 1989, Section 124A - Appellant's mother died after falling from train while traveling with valid season pass - Tribunal rejected claim finding no untoward incident based on railway documents suggesting trespassing - High Court reversed, holding death resulted from accidental fall during travel, constituting untoward incident under the Act (Paras 1-4, 14).

B) Evidence Law - Documentary Evidence - Railway Reports Reliability - Railways Act, 1989 - Station Master's initial report stated cause 'not known' while subsequent police and DRM reports alleged trespassing - Court found contradictions and held subsequent reports based on incorrect facts, giving primacy to initial Station Master report (Paras 6-11).

C) Evidence Law - Expert Opinion - Tribunal's Medical Inference - Railways Act, 1989 - Tribunal concluded trespassing based on nature of injuries without medical expert evidence - Court held Tribunal not expert body to determine cause from injuries alone, especially without witness examination (Para 12).

D) Railway Law - Exclusion Clauses - Own Criminal Act - Railways Act, 1989, Sections 124A(c), 147 - Railways invoked Section 147 to exclude compensation under Section 124A(c) for 'own criminal act' - Court found no evidence deceased entered railway without authority, misused property, or refused to leave, making exclusion inapplicable (Para 13).

Issue of Consideration: Whether the death of the deceased passenger constituted an 'untoward incident' as defined under the Railways Act, 1989, and whether the exclusion clauses under Section 124A(c) for 'own criminal act' were applicable

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order set aside. Tribunal's finding on untoward incident reversed. Deceased died due to accidental fall from train, constituting untoward incident. Compensation of Rs. 4,00,000 with 6% interest per annum from date of accident till realization, subject to cap of Rs. 8,00,000, to be paid within 12 weeks of application.

2026 LawText (BOM) (03) 86

First Appeal No. 619 of 2018

2026-03-17

Jitendra Jain, J.

Mr. Vaneet Khosla, Mr. Pratik Irpatgire

Rajani Ravindra Pol d/o. Deceased Shyamal Sachin Salvi

Union Of India, Through The General Manager, Western Railway

Nature of Litigation: Appeal against order of Railway Claims Tribunal rejecting compensation claim under Railways Act, 1989

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought reversal of Tribunal's order and grant of compensation for death of mother in railway accident

Filing Reason

Tribunal rejected claim on ground that incident did not constitute 'untoward incident' as defined under Railways Act

Previous Decisions

Railway Claims Tribunal order dated 31st January 2018 rejected claim, finding deceased was bonafide passenger but incident not untoward incident

Issues

Whether the death constituted an 'untoward incident' under Railways Act, 1989 Whether exclusion clauses under Section 124A(c) for 'own criminal act' were applicable

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued death resulted from accidental fall during travel, constituting untoward incident Respondent relied on railway documents to allege trespassing and invoke exclusion under Section 124A(c)

Ratio Decidendi

Death from accidental fall during travel with valid ticket constitutes untoward incident under Railways Act, 1989. Exclusion for own criminal act under Section 124A(c) not applicable without evidence of trespassing or criminal act under Section 147. Tribunal cannot infer cause from injuries without medical expert evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The deceased died on account of an accidental fall from a train carrying passengers with a bonafide ticket In none of the report it is stated that the deceased entered into any part of the railway without lawful authority The Tribunal is not an expert body for coming to a certain conclusion based on the nature of the injury

Procedural History

Incident occurred on 28th December 2010. Application filed before Railway Claims Tribunal. Tribunal order dated 31st January 2018 rejected claim. First Appeal No. 619 of 2018 filed in High Court. Amendment carried out pursuant to court order dated 17th October 2023. High Court judgment dated 17th March 2026.

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railway Accident Case, Reversing Tribunal's Finding on Untoward Incident. Death from Accidental Fall During Travel with Valid Ticket Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989, as Exclusion for Own ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Consideration of Mitigating Circumstances in a Criminal Appeal. Examining the Impact of Personal History and Lengthy Incarceration on Sentencing