Search Results for "District Judiciary"

783 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 783 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order of Deputy Charity Commissioner in Trust Election Dispute Due to Procedural Irregularity and Judicial Impropriety — Allegations of Hasty Decision-Making on Last Day of Transfer Lead to Setting Aside of Election Direction.

The petitioners, claiming to be members of the Rural Education Society Murud, challenged an order dated 20.2.2024 passed by the Deputy Charity Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Challenge to MPSC Procedural Rule on Wait-List in Judicial Service Recruitment. Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 Rule 6(3)(b) and Article 234 of the Constitution Examined.

The Bombay High Court Division Bench heard a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who had applied for the post of Civil Judge Junior Division a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Extension of Justice Shetty Commission Benefits to Family Court Staff. The court held that staff of Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur are entitled to the same benefits as staff in other districts under the Family Courts Act, 1984.

The petitioners, who were staff members of the Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Judicial Officer in Disciplinary Proceedings for Misconduct. Non-Supply of Enquiry Report Before Final Order Does Not Vitiate Proceedings Absent Prejudice.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, joined the Maharashtra Judicial Service in 1990. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him, and an enqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Judicial Officers as Chairpersons of Scrutiny Committees for Scheduled Tribe Verification. Court holds that appointment of Chairpersons is an administrative policy decision and not a matter for judicial mandate.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Adivasi Thakur Jamat Seva Mandal, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the State of Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...