Search Results for "Conclusive Proof"

1724 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1724 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Gang Rape and Murder Case, Upholds Convictions and Life Sentences. Court finds no merit in appeals challenging conviction under Sections 376, 302, 201 read with 149 IPC for gang rape and murder of a minor girl.

The case involves a gang rape and murder of a minor girl in Khanapur, Belgaum. The victim, aged about 15 years, went missing on 27.10.2007. Her dead b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by single neck press without premeditation or intention to kill.

The appellant, Sagar Bhagwat Gawande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon for the murder of his wife Archana under Section 302 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal of Convicted Husband for Murder of Wife Under Section 302 IPC. Appellant Challenges Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Testimony of Interested Witnesses.

The appellant, Syed Sahil @ Krishnamurthy, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of his wife, Seema Thasleem, under Section 302 IPC. The cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Failure to Prove Title and Possession. Court upholds dismissal of suit for declaration of ownership and injunction based on insufficient evidence of title and possession under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants, Noorjahan and others, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction against the respondents in respect of a prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...