Search Results for "Bombay Police Act Section 135"

746 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 746 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in TADA Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 20A(1) — Prior Approval of DSP Mandatory. The Court held that recording of information under TADA without prior approval of the District Superintendent of Police vitiates the entire proceedings, and the defect is not curable.

The appeal arose from an order of the Designated TADA Court dismissing the appellants' application for discharge on the ground of non-compliance with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes De Novo Trial Order in Summary Case — Section 326(3) CrPC Does Not Mandate Retrial When Evidence Already Recorded by Predecessor Magistrate. Successor Magistrate Can Proceed from Stage of Final Arguments.

The petitioner, Ulhas s/o Fulchand Rathod, was being tried in Summary Criminal Case No. 597/2008 for offences under Sections 143, 294, 341, 504, 506 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension and Departmental Inquiry Against Municipal Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suspension Order Passed by Municipal Commissioner Instead of General Body Held Invalid Under Section 57 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Mr. Sanjay G. Gharat, an employee of the Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC), challenged the suspension order dated 18th Jun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused Arrested After Charge-Sheet Filing in Further Investigation. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Applies to Accused Arrested During Further Investigation, Not Extinguished by Prior Charge-Sheet Filing.

The Bombay High Court, in a referral order, resolved a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the applicability of default bail under S...