Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order for Sale of Seized Rice and Release of Truck on Bank Guarantee in Essential Commodities Act Case — Held That Collector Has No Power to Order Sale of Perishable Goods Without Magistrate's Order Under Section 459 CrPC

The petitioners, Shaikh Yunus and Dinesh Bagade, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Three Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Injured Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307, 326, 427, 148 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from an incident where the complainant, Khawaja Iqbaluddin (PW1), alleged that on 25th September 2003, at around 8:30 p.m., while he w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Office-Bearers of Cooperative Housing Society; Holds Absence of Prima Facie Case Under SC/ST Act and MCOCA for Civil Dispute

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three proceedings: Criminal Application No.4144 of 2009, Criminal Application No.3304 of 2010, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Child Welfare Committee Chairperson for Violation of Natural Justice. Notification under Section 29 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given before removal.

The petitioner, Renuka Vishnu Ghule, was appointed as a Member of the Child Welfare Committee, Aurangabad, by notification dated 02.06.2008. She later...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeals for Enhancement of Land Acquisition Compensation Due to Alleged Inadequate Valuation of Land and Trees. Key Issues Involved Separate Compensation for Land Bearing Fruit-Bearing Trees and Applicability of Comparable Awards Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The judgment concerned three first appeals filed by the original claimants, whose agricultural lands were acquired in 1995 for the construction of Shi...