Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

169 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

30 Jan 2026

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Trust's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Market Yard Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Preliminary Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Filed After Over a Year Held Not Maintainable.

3 Feb 2025

The Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust filed two writ petitions challenging the acquisition of its land by the State of Karnataka for the benefit of the Agricu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Demand of Market Fee and DPC Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Market Committee Cannot Levy Fee on Transactions Prior to Notification of Market Area Under Sections 26 and 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Arasa Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Cancelling Shop Allotment in APMC Yard — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Licence Cancelled Without Notice or Hearing, Held Arbitrary and Illegal Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mohammed Shah Nawaz, proprietor of Shah Nawaz and Brothers, had been carrying on business as a commission agent in the vegetable marke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recount Order in APMC Election — Commissioner's Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Milind Shreeram Tayade, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Amravati, from a seat reserved...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Refusal to Register Hamals as Members. Court upholds Registrar's order that hamals working in Agricultural Produce Market Committee are not entitled to membership under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 as they are not 'agriculturists' or 'persons dealing with agricultural produce'.

2 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Rajendra Tikaram Bagmare, a hamal (porter) working at the Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Yavatmal, filed a writ petition und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Against Labour Court Order Granting Benefits Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Held That Computation of Benefits Under Section 33C(2) Cannot Be Based on Prior Adjudication of Entitlement Which Was Not Finally Decided.

28 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Gondia, challenged the judgment and order dated 15/11/2010 passed by the Labour Court in Referen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of APMC Managing Committee Term Under Section 14(3) of Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The Court held that the State Government's power to extend the term of a managing committee is statutory and does not require prior consultation, and the petitioner had no locus standi to challenge the order.

20 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Ashok s/o Parlhadrao Thakre, a member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Digras, filed a writ petition challenging an order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Market Fee Exemption Case - Rural Development Fee Not Automatically Covered by Market Fee Exemption Under Industrial Policy, 2003. The Court held that exemption from Market fee under Section 23 of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 does not include exemption from Rural Development fee under Sections 5 and 6 of the Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987, as they are separate levies under different statutes.

15 Mar 2011

The case pertains to exemption from payment of Market fee and Rural Development fee sought by the respondent company under the Industrial Policy, 2003...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)