Search Results for "temporary promotion"

362 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 362 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Based on Ad-Hoc Promotee Father's Service. Compassionate appointment scheme does not extend to dependents of ad-hoc promotees whose promotion was never confirmed.

The petitioner, Nikhil Maruti Gosarade, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 25 June 2018, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Transfer Order of Government Officer in Town Planning Department — Upholds State's Power of Transfer as an Incident of Service. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Not Vitiated by Malafides or Violation of Statutory Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende, was serving as Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Pune. He was transferred to the post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Primary Teachers Against Transfer Orders — Violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Primary Teachers Transfer Rules, 2024. Court Quashes Transfer Orders as Arbitrary and Contrary to Statutory Rules, Directs Reconsideration.

The petitioners, 21 primary teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Beed, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer orders issued by the respo...