Search Results for "section 32G"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Decision on Rights of Permanent Tenants Under Section 32F of Bombay Tenancy Act. Core Legal Issue Involves Applicability of Section 32F to Permanent Tenants Where Landlady was a Widow on Tillers' Day.

The dispute arose from tenancy proceedings under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 concerning agricultural land originally Inam land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition in Tenancy Dispute Involving Widow Tenant's Deemed Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Tenant's Failure to Exercise Option Under Section 32F After Widow's Death Precludes Automatic Purchase.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands at Wai under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. On the tillor's day (1.4.1957), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Partition Decree, Rejects Exclusive Ownership Claim Based on Tenancy Order. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Determine Whether Section 32G Order Was Obtained for Joint Family or Individual Capacity.

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by respondent no.1, Maruti Laxman Shelar, claiming a 1/5th share in ancestral joint family properties. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Tenant's Claim for Restoration and Price Fixation Under Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948. Protected Tenancy Status Crystalized on Tiller's Day; Landlord's Subsequent Possession Recovery Held Void as Proceeding Was Without Legal Sanctity.

The dispute pertained to agricultural land in village Asoda, Jalgaon, originally owned by Subba Girdhar Jagtap and leased to Sampat Ramu Narkhede arou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...